SQL 정적 분석과 PPT·HTML critic을 고도화하고 코드 탭 fallback 문맥을 보강

- SqlAnalysisService에 script intent, dependency, review focus 계산을 추가해 migration/seed/reporting SQL의 위험도와 검토 포인트를 더 정확히 안내하도록 개선했습니다.
- HtmlSkill에 decision_matrix, metric_strip 섹션을 추가하고 ArtifactQualityReviewService/ArtifactRepairGuideService에서 board·strategy 문서의 의사결정 구조와 KPI 연결 부족을 더 정밀하게 진단하도록 강화했습니다.
- DeckQualityReviewService와 DeckRepairGuideService를 확장해 executive summary headline, comparison trade-off, roadmap milestone, chart takeaway, KPI context 부족을 추가로 감지하고 보정 가이드를 반환하도록 정리했습니다.
- WorkspaceContextGenerator와 CodeLanguageCatalog를 업데이트해 SQL 저장소에서 SQL Review Focus와 확장된 workflow summary를 제공하도록 맞췄고, README/DEVELOPMENT/NEXT_ROADMAP에 2026-04-15 11:36 (KST) 기준 이력을 반영했습니다.

검증 결과
- dotnet build src/AxCopilot/AxCopilot.csproj -c Release -v minimal -p:OutputPath=bin\\verify_code_sql_doc_final\\ -p:IntermediateOutputPath=obj\\verify_code_sql_doc_final\\ : 경고 0 / 오류 0
- dotnet test src/AxCopilot.Tests/AxCopilot.Tests.csproj -c Release -v minimal --filter "SqlDialectDetectorTests|SqlAnalysisServiceTests|CodeLanguageCatalogTests|WorkspaceContextGeneratorTests|ArtifactQualityReviewServiceTests|ArtifactRepairGuideServiceTests|DeckQualityReviewServiceTests|HtmlSkillConsultingSectionsTests" -p:OutputPath=bin\\verify_code_sql_doc_final_tests\\ -p:IntermediateOutputPath=obj\\verify_code_sql_doc_final_tests\\ : 통과 62

src/AxCopilot.Tests/Services/DeckQualityReviewServiceTests.cs

@@ -125,4 +125,46 @@ public class DeckQualityReviewServiceTests
 
         review.Issues.Should().Contain(issue => issue.Message.Contains("supporting rationale or next steps", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
     }
+
+    [Fact]
+    public void ReviewDeck_ShouldFlagComparisonTradeoffsAndKpiContext()
+    {
+        using var slides = JsonDocument.Parse(
+            """
+            [
+              { "layout": "title", "title": "Board Review" },
+              {
+                "layout": "executive_summary",
+                "title": "Executive Summary",
+                "summary_points": ["A", "B"],
+                "recommendation": "Proceed"
+              },
+              {
+                "layout": "comparison",
+                "title": "Options",
+                "headline": "Choose a path",
+                "options": [
+                  { "name": "A", "verdict": "Recommended" },
+                  { "name": "B", "verdict": "Fallback" }
+                ]
+              },
+              {
+                "layout": "kpi_dashboard",
+                "title": "KPIs",
+                "headline": "Performance snapshot",
+                "kpis": [
+                  { "label": "Margin", "value": "+2.4pt" },
+                  { "label": "Lead Time", "value": "-12%" },
+                  { "label": "Quality", "value": "96%" }
+                ]
+              }
+            ]
+            """);
+
+        var review = DeckQualityReviewService.ReviewDeck("Thin Signals", slides.RootElement, hasTemplate: false, autoRepairCount: 0);
+
+        review.Issues.Should().Contain(issue => issue.Message.Contains("sharper single-message headline", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
+        review.Issues.Should().Contain(issue => issue.Message.Contains("trade-offs behind the verdict", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
+        review.Issues.Should().Contain(issue => issue.Message.Contains("trend or note context", StringComparison.OrdinalIgnoreCase));
+    }
 }